How to Get “PE Value” With or Without PE

Watch the Replay Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.First Name *Last Name *Phone * Work Email * Would you like to join SRG's newsletter to receive industry updates and other webinar opportunities? Yes No Access Recording Can You Get Private Equity Value Without Selling to Private Equity? In this session, Succession Resource Group’s David Grau, Jr., MBA, unpacks how advisory firm owners can pursue private equity-level value whether or not they sell to private equity. The webinar breaks down the difference between direct PE investment and PE-backed aggregators, how headline multiples of up to 15x EBITDA translate into the 9x to 11x most sellers actually realize once deal terms are accounted for, and why the definition of a seller has shifted toward owners who sell and continue to run their firm. David also reviews the four variables that shape the right path, including practice size, timeline, buyer universe, and long-term priorities, along with the deal structures that decide what an owner takes home, from the traditional 80/20 down payment to today’s 40/30/30 split of cash, rolled equity, and earnouts. He then shows how internal succession and peer-to-peer sales can close the value gap and approach PE-level outcomes when firms start early, keep growth in focus, and sell in tranches. Advisors weighing an exit in the next three to ten years, evaluating an unsolicited offer, or planning an internal succession will find this a practical, data-backed guide to their options. Host David Grau Jr. MBA CEO/President Paper-plane Linkedin-in

How to Get “PE Value” With or Without PE

Watch the Replay https://vimeo.com/1208241907?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci Can You Get Private Equity Value Without Selling to Private Equity? In this session, Succession Resource Group’s David Grau, Jr., MBA, unpacks how advisory firm owners can pursue private equity-level value whether or not they sell to private equity. The webinar breaks down the difference between direct PE investment and PE-backed aggregators, how headline multiples of up to 15x EBITDA translate into the 9x to 11x most sellers actually realize once deal terms are accounted for, and why the definition of a seller has shifted toward owners who sell and continue to run their firm. David also reviews the four variables that shape the right path, including practice size, timeline, buyer universe, and long-term priorities, along with the deal structures that decide what an owner takes home, from the traditional 80/20 down payment to today’s 40/30/30 split of cash, rolled equity, and earnouts. He then shows how internal succession and peer-to-peer sales can close the value gap and approach PE-level outcomes when firms start early, keep growth in focus, and sell in tranches. Advisors weighing an exit in the next three to ten years, evaluating an unsolicited offer, or planning an internal succession will find this a practical, data-backed guide to their options. Host David Grau Jr. MBA CEO/President Paper-plane Linkedin-in

Advisor Compensation: How to Pay Your Team the Right Way (Ep. 34)

The Compensation Conversation Your Firm Needs to Have Compensation is one of the most consequential levers in an advisory firmm and one of the most misunderstood. For years, firm owners relied on industry surveys to benchmark pay. Most of those resources are gone, and the ones that remain are pulling from data that is neither vetted nor reliable. At the same time, the firms themselves have grown and changed faster than their compensation models have. In this episode of The Fine Print, David Grau Jr. sits down with Julia Sexton, CVA, Director of Team Solutions at SRG, to work through what modern compensation design actually looks like for advisory firms. The conversation starts with benchmarking, where to find accurate data and why survey-based studies fall shortm and builds into a practical framework for structuring pay around the goals you have for your business, not just what the firm next door is doing. Julia walks through why production-based compensation creates silos even in firms that say they want collaboration, how to design different structures for farmers and hunters on your team, and why grid-based payouts that grow with market appreciation without added work put a slow choke hold on your margins and your firm’s value. The episode also covers eligibility criteria, career path design, and how to back-test any compensation change before rolling it out so your team barely notices the difference. Show Notes Compensation is the most powerful lever in an advisory firm — and one of the least examined. When the go-to industry benchmarks disappeared, many owners kept running compensation models they inherited from the wirehouse era without stopping to ask whether those models still fit where their business is headed. The data problem no one is talking about. The Investment News compensation study that the industry relied on for years is gone. What replaced it pulls from government sources with small, unvetted sample sets. SRG built its Talent Strategy Report from thousands of actual valuations, scrubbed, reviewed, and confirmed, because survey data and evaluation data are not the same thing. Location and firm size matter less than you think. Geographic pay premiums have largely flattened in a remote-first world. Firm size affects specialization of roles more than raw compensation levels. A smaller firm may actually pay more because fewer people are wearing more hats. There is no right compensation model, only the right one for your goals. Before designing anything, owners need an honest conversation about what kind of business they are building. An ensemble model built for scalability and enterprise value requires a fundamentally different compensation structure than a siloed model built around individual books. Production-based compensation creates silos, even in firms that call themselves a team. If advisors are paid on individual revenue, they will optimize for individual revenue. The incentive and the stated goal are working against each other, and compensation always wins. Farmers and hunters need different structures, not just different amounts. Farmers should be incentivized on assets serviced, net flows, and client satisfaction. Hunters should be rewarded for new business brought in. Putting a farmer’s compensation model on a hunter, or vice versa, produces exactly the wrong behavior. Grid-based payouts quietly destroy firm value. An advisor managing the same 100 households gets paid double seven years later because markets appreciated. The workload did not change. The complexity did not change. That margin erosion compounds over time and makes internal succession nearly impossible to structure. The BBP model: base, bonus, and profit. Splitting compensation into three buckets creates stability through salary, drives individual performance through bonusing, and aligns the team around long-term firm success through profit participation. Eligibility criteria, including fee schedule compliance, training, and client satisfaction scores, determine who gets access to the bonus bucket in a given year. Career path design is a capacity strategy. Progressively raising the minimum client tier an advisor is responsible for, and reducing their payout on smaller accounts, creates a natural delegation structure. Founders do not need to recruit expensive lateral hires. They need a junior advisor at the bottom of the org chart so everyone above them can move up. Back-test before you roll anything out. Run the new model against what your team actually made last year. If the output looks dramatically different, calibrate the levers before you announce anything. The goal is for the transition to feel like continuity, not a renegotiation. Hosted By David Grau Jr., MBA (Founder / CEO) Julia Sexton, CVA (Director of Strategic Organizational Planning)

Inside SRG’s Talent Strategy Report: Compensation Benchmarks for Advisors

The Talent Strategy Report at a Glance The Talent Strategy Report (TSR) is SRG’s annual compensation and staffing benchmarking report built for independent financial advisory firms. This infographic breaks down what’s inside, how the data is sourced, and what makes it different from the generic salary surveys most firms rely on. If you’re making compensation decisions this year, start here. Download Infographic

5 Most Common Post-Transition Roles

Download Your eBook! Uncover Your Post Sale Potential.  You have many post-transition opportunities – from helping develop and analyze investment models, becoming a mentor to junior advisors, and/or staying on in a rainmaking capacity. Selling your practice now and staying on for the next couple years is not only achievable, but also creates more possibilities than most advisors think. Take a look at the (5) five post-transition roles that allow you to phase out on your terms and uncover your post-sale potential! Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.First Name *Last Name *Phone * Work Email * Would you like to join SRG's newsletter to receive industry updates and other webinar opportunities? * Yes No Download

Building Your Team for Succession Success

Watch the Replay Does Your Team Structure Support Your Succession Plan? In this webinar, Succession Resource Group’s Julia Sexton, CVA, and David Grau Jr., MBA, explore how employment-related planning can strengthen an advisory firm’s long-term succession strategy. The session covers how employment structure, role clarity, and internal alignment all factor into a firm’s ability to execute a successful transition. Succession Resource Group walks through common organizational and planning gaps that create challenges during succession events, and what firms can do to address them before a transition is on the horizon. Advisors preparing for internal succession, evaluating their current team structure, or working to build a stronger operational foundation will find this session particularly relevant. Host David Grau Jr. MBA CEO/President Paper-plane Linkedin-in Host Julia Sexton, CVA Director of Strategic Organizational Planning Paper-plane Linkedin-in

Building Your Team for Succession Success

Watch the Replay Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.First Name *Last Name *Phone * Work Email * Would you like to join SRG’s newsletter to receive industry updates and other webinar opportunities? Yes No Access Recording Does Your Team Structure Support Your Succession Plan? In this webinar, Succession Resource Group’s Julia Sexton, CVA, and David Grau Jr., MBA, explore how employment-related planning can strengthen an advisory firm’s long-term succession strategy. The session covers how employment structure, role clarity, and internal alignment all factor into a firm’s ability to execute a successful transition. Succession Resource Group walks through common organizational and planning gaps that create challenges during succession events, and what firms can do to address them before a transition is on the horizon. Advisors preparing for internal succession, evaluating their current team structure, or working to build a stronger operational foundation will find this session particularly relevant. Host David Grau Jr. MBA CEO/President Paper-plane Linkedin-in Host Julia Sexton, CVA Director of Strategic Organizational Planning Paper-plane Linkedin-in

How to Make a Merger a Growth Move: A 5-Step Roadmap for Advisory Firms

For many financial advisory firm owners, growth eventually hits a ceiling. Organic client acquisition slows, operational demands pile up, and the question surfaces: what comes next? Mergers have become one of the most effective strategies for advisory firms looking to scale, reduce risk, and build long-term enterprise value. But a merger done poorly can create more problems than it solves. The difference between a merger that accelerates your business and one that stalls it comes down to preparation, process, and the right professional guidance. In a recent SRG webinar, Nicole Frey, CFP®, Director of Team Solutions, and Ryan Grau, CVA, CBA, Director of Valuations, walked through the full merger lifecycle for advisory firms. Below is a summary of the key takeaways. You can also watch the full webinar recording here. Why Advisory Firms Pursue Mergers Advisory firms explore mergers for a range of reasons, and the right motivation depends on where you are in your business lifecycle. Some of the most common drivers include: Faster growth. Rather than relying solely on organic growth, merging with a partner who brings their own book of business can accelerate your trajectory. SRG’s AcquireEdge program helps firms identify and evaluate acquisition and merger opportunities with this goal in mind. Greater scale and efficiency. When two firms combine, revenue may grow at a faster rate as the combined firm expands its client base, referral network, service capacity, and opportunities to capture additional wallet share. Expenses often increase at a slower rate because core infrastructure, technology, compliance, management, and administrative costs can be spread across a larger revenue base, creating margin improvement as the firm scales. Risk reduction and continuity. Sole proprietors face significant key-person risk. Adding a partner means your clients are protected if something happens to you. It also opens the door to better succession planning and contingency planning options. (For more on why contingency planning matters in the context of M&A, see Contingency Planning: A Key to Acquisition Success.) Expanded capabilities. A merger can help you offer new services, diversify your client demographics, enter new geographic markets, or create a one-stop shop by combining with complementary practices like CPA firms. For firms thinking about strategic direction at this level, SRG’s enterprise consulting services can help map the path forward. Talent attraction. In an aging industry, larger combined firms can offer more defined career paths and specialized roles, making it easier to recruit and retain talented professionals. Improved negotiation power. Operating at a larger scale gives you leverage when negotiating vendor contracts, payout grid rates, and fee structures with broker-dealers or custodians. Step 1: Get Your Entity Structure Right Before you start looking for a merger partner, your own house needs to be in order. Your entity structure — the legal form, tax status, and organizational setup of your firm — directly impacts how a merger can be executed. SRG’s entity support services are designed to help firms get this foundation in place. (For a deeper dive, download Your Guide to Proper Entity Structure.) The two most common legal forms in the advisory space are corporations and LLCs. Frey noted that LLCs taxed as partnerships offer significantly more flexibility for mergers. In a partnership structure, a new partner can contribute their book of business in exchange for ownership without triggering a taxable event. In an S-corporation, by contrast, that same contribution is often treated as a sale by the IRS, creating an immediate tax liability even though no cash changed hands. For firms that want the flexibility of an LLC partnership and the FICA tax savings of an S-Corp election, there is a hybrid solution: an LLC taxed as a partnership at the operating level, with each partner holding their interest through an individual S-Corp holding company. It adds complexity, but it gives you the best of both worlds. The takeaway: address your entity structure before the merger conversation heats up. Trying to restructure and merge simultaneously can be overwhelming. If your entity is already in place, SRG’s entity maintenance program ensures your governance documents and compliance stay current as the business evolves. For more on how entity structure supports growth, see Set Your Firm Up for Success — Using Entity Structure to Unleash Growth. Step 2: Define Your Ideal Merger Partner Not every merger is a good merger. As Frey put it during the webinar, a merger is “almost like a marriage, just on a business level.” You want to build trust and rapport before proposing anything formal. Finding the right partner requires honest self-assessment and intentional criteria. Your ideal merger partner should be similar or complementary to your business. Frey recommended evaluating potential partners across several dimensions: Revenue sources and service model compatibility. If one firm operates primarily through in-person client meetings and the other runs on virtual engagement, there needs to be a plan to reconcile those models or you risk losing clients during the transition. Client types and demographics. Complementary client bases can be a strength, but mismatched expectations around client service intensity can become a source of tension. Growth goals. If one partner is aggressively pursuing growth while the other is winding down toward retirement, that misalignment needs to be addressed through compensation structures rather than equity adjustments, which can create IRS audit complications. Once you have identified a potential partner, start by networking through broker-dealers, professional conferences, centers of influence, and business coaches. Build the relationship before introducing formal merger conversations. (For practical guidance on early-stage partnership conversations, see Teaming Advice When Preparing for a Merger.) When the time is right, sign an NDA and begin sharing financial information through a structured due diligence process. At minimum, you should be requesting three years of financial history with a deep dive on the trailing 12 months, a breakdown of the client base (demographics, asset distribution, concentration risk), staffing levels and compensation commitments, any existing equity-sharing or profit-sharing promises, major contract terms and expiration dates, and each owner’s goals — whether growth-oriented or succession-oriented — along with their expected

The Exchange: Selling Your Advisory Business and What Every Owner Needs to Know (Ep. 33)

Navigating the Noise When It’s Time to Sell When you decide to sell your advisory business, you will be approached from every direction; aggregators, PE firms, broker dealers, and peers all ready to make an offer. The question isn’t whether demand exists. It’s whether you have the right team to make sure you’re getting the most out of it. In this episode of The Fine Print, David Grau Jr., MBA is joined by Kristen Grau CPA, CVA, CEPA, Parker Finot, and Ryan Grau CVA, CBA to break down what seller advocacy really means, where self-negotiated deals tend to fall short, and what advisors should look for when choosing an intermediary. You will hear why great offers never show up in the first draft, what the “auction” label gets wrong about the listing process, how some intermediaries secretly work both sides of the deal, and why getting a valuation three years before you’re ready to sell can change everything. Show Notes The noise every seller has to cut through. Aggregators, PE firms, broker dealers, peer buyers, and DIY platforms are all competing for your attention. The real question isn’t which offer to take — it’s whether you have the right expertise on your side to evaluate them properly. The risks of going it alone. Self-negotiated deals often skip NDAs, skip proper due diligence, and rely on one-page agreements that banks won’t underwrite. Sellers narrow their options to one or two familiar names and leave significant value on the table before negotiations even begin. Fit vs. price: the conversation has shifted. The industry long put fit above everything else. That’s changing. Price, terms, and taxes are increasingly driving decisions — and advisors who sell to the first familiar face often sacrifice all three without realizing it. Great offers never show up in the first draft. Eye-catching multiples often mask back-end payments tied to growth targets the seller has never come close to hitting. Knowing what to look for — and what questions to ask — is the difference between a good deal and a great one. The “auction” label is a buyer’s talking point. What sellers call a listing process, buyers call an auction to make it sound unappealing. In reality it is a confidential, structured process that lets sellers compare qualified buyers, protect their identity, and make a decision based on actual fit rather than whoever showed up first. Not all intermediaries are working for you. Some firms charge sellers a retainer while simultaneously collecting fees from buyers — limiting the pool presented and skewing the outcome. Ask who your intermediary is getting paid by and how many times they have transacted with the same buyers. Get your valuation done three years out. Waiting until you are ready to sell leaves no runway to improve your numbers, clean up your financials, or understand your KPIs. A valuation three years prior gives you time to act on what it tells you. Your business is your most valuable asset. Whether you plan to sell in two years or ten, giving the process the time and attention it deserves — with the right team in your corner — is one of the most consequential decisions you will make for yourself, your clients, and your family. Hosted By David Grau Jr., MBA (Founder / CEO) Kristen Grau, CPA, CVA, CEPA (Executive Vice President) Ryan Grau, CVA (Director of Valuations) Parker Finot (Director of Transaction Advisory Services)

Financial advisor pay is ‘one of the most powerful strategic levers’ for RIAs

By: Tobias SalingerPublishing Date: March 17, 2026 Far from simply being a recruiting and retention tool, financial advisor compensation plans are turning into important growth and valuation engines, according to succession planning experts. Registered investment advisory firms or other advisory practices must create career paths and pay plans that evolve quickly enough to keep up with industry competition, advisorcareer advancement, geographic factors and the company’s long-term goals, according to a webinar last month on compensation trends led by Julia Sexton, the director of strategic organizational planning at consulting firm Succession Resource Group, and Ryan Grau, the company’s director of valuations. They presented the first of what will become an annual compensation study based on data from the RIAs that use the firm’s services. And the central takeaway revolved around the divergent impact among firms that have taken proactive steps, and those that haven’t. “Today isn’t just about benchmarking numbers,” Sexton said. “It’s about aligning compensation with role, clarity, behaviors, growth objectives and long-term enterprise value, because when compensation is designed intentionally, it becomes one of the most powerful strategic levers that you have in your firm and is so critical to so many transaction and business growth initiatives, succession planning, viability and just the overall cultural and financial health of your business.” On the other hand, Grau jumped in to add, failing to build an effective compensation strategy is “one of the quickest ways to derail value.” To read the full article, please visit: https://www.financial-planning.com/news/financial-advisor-pay-is-a-powerful-strategic-lever-for-rias Disclaimer This article was first published by Tobias Salinger The original article can be found here. All rights to the original content are held by FinancialPlanning.com.